Holding the Thread

How brands sustain meaning in a fragmented culture

“In such ugly times, the only true protest is beauty.” –Dries Van Noten, quoting Phil Ochs, on the BoF Podcast

Dries creates beauty as form imposed on disorder—a way of holding steady when much around it is falling apart.

We are living in a moment that resists cohesion. Human identity is no longer fixed—it is performed across platforms, calibrated to different audiences, and constantly adjusted. We move between versions of ourselves, public and private, aspirational and anonymous, without a clear sense of where one ends and another begins. Meanwhile, the anchors that once stabilised culture have dispersed. Shared narratives have given way to micro-communities, small self-reinforcing systems of taste and belief where what feels obvious to one group is invisible to another. All while technology flattens depth into something that has to be actively sought.

More than ever, we want to express individuality while also craving belonging—something larger than ourselves. And increasingly, that desire gets directed toward brands.

Successful brands build worlds in response to this. They assemble products, messaging, environments, and behaviours into something coherent enough to resonate with. A Ralph Lauren store that offers a version of American life you can step into. A Bella Freud jumper that doesn’t just signal identity, but helps stabilise it. As Ana Andjelic has argued, the most powerful brands today operate less as products and more as cultural worlds people want to inhabit.

These worlds are not accidental. They are produced through decisions, systems, repetition, restraint, and the slow accumulation of choices over time. But this raises a more difficult question: what allows that coherence to survive once it leaves the conditions in which it was made?

Once a brand moves beyond its point of origin, meaning begins to shift—reshaped by context, interpretation, and the people who encounter it. What feels precise at the source can register as diffuse, flattened, or misread in culture. This is not a failure of communication. It is the condition under which meaning now operates.

The industry’s instinct, when perception slips, is to fix the message. Refine the campaign. Increase consistency. Distribute it at scale. Sometimes that works. But meaning is shaped at every point it passes through, often by things no campaign can reach: a staff member having an off day, a product that falls slightly below expectation, a cultural context that reads the same signal differently.

What reaches the outside world is not the brand as it was designed. It is the brand as it is produced, repeatedly, by people and systems working with what they’ve been given. The gap between intention and interpretation is where the most interesting questions about brand coherence live.

Two cult brands make it visible.

Ralph Lauren started with a tie. In 1967, in New York, a line of wide hand-cut ties under the name Polo—drawn from Old Hollywood proportions and refined British tailoring. When Bloomingdale's agreed to stock them, they asked him to use their private label. He refused to change the name. That self-belief shaped what followed.

Ralph Lauren campaign as himself, 1985

Ralph Lauren campaign, 1989

What he built isn't just a fashion label. It's a vision of American life—East Coast aristocracy, Western frontier, Ivy League, sport, leisure, wealth, ease—held together across decades and categories with unusual consistency. The Rhinelander Mansion on Madison Avenue, opened in 1986, was one of the first stores to stage a brand as a lived environment rather than a place of transaction. Wood panelling, worn leather, fireplaces, personal objects. It felt less like a shop and more like stepping into someone's home, and in doing so redefined what retail could be. Each subsequent category, from childrenswear to home to fragrance, extended the same logic. Not everyone could buy the full lifestyle, but many could buy into it. A shirt, a cap, a towel. Each object a piece of the same world. Purple Label sits at the top, setting the standard that structures everything below it, allowing the brand to scale without losing its essence.

Rhinelander mansion, Ralph Lauren New York

Tyson Beckford for Polo Ralph Lauren, 1990s

Then in the 1990s, the brand's world became so much more than it had planned. Tyson Beckford's campaigns pushed beyond the preppy demographic. Simultaneously, the hip-hop community began acquiring, wearing, and recontextualising Polo—not as aspirational Americana but as a declaration of ambition entirely their own. Unexpected layering and swagger brought a new level of cool. The meaning was real, widely circulated, and culturally generative. Proof that organisations produce meaning, but don't own what it becomes.

That breadth continues today. On menswear runways, the Ralph Lauren codes—the rugby shirts, the worn-in blazers, the easy unhurried layering of it all—are still sought after, cited, and worn by people who understand exactly what they're reaching for. The world was built to last rather than trend, which is a rarity among brands at this scale. Ralph Lauren, at its best, is still recognisably itself—still the same vision of American ease that started with a wide-cut tie and a refusal to compromise.

The tensions that come with that scale—knowledge unevenly held across the organisation, the polo horse reading differently to different audiences—are the structural cost of having built something large enough for the whole world to find its way into. Not decline. Evidence of reach.

Bella Freud sustains coherence differently. Not through systems, but proximity.

Bella Freud

The necktie appears here too, but as something else: armour. A way of settling into a more confident version of oneself. Freud—former apprentice to Vivienne Westwood, daughter of Lucian, great-granddaughter of Sigmund—built something that resists heritage in any conventional sense. She's spoken of instability in early life, moving between places with little structure. What emerges in the work is a search for clarity and control: uniform, tailoring, language. The phrases hand-drawn onto knitwear became the brand's most recognisable codes. Ginsberg is God. Je t'aime Jane. 1970, set against a white stripe to brighten the face like a string of pearls. The lettering is imperfect, a voice present without needing to be spoken. Rooted in punk. Clothes as language, working as tools.

The Chiltern Street flagship holds the same logic. Less retail space than living room—soft, familiar, and slightly insular. And then there is Fashion Neurosis, Bella Freud’s interview series, where guests lie on a sofa filmed from above, discussing identity, desire, and creativity in a way that feels genuinely unguarded. Recorded in Bella’s home, it extends the brand’s world beyond fashion itself. The same register, a different medium, the thread intact. Hours of generous, unhurried content that does the work of a thousand campaigns without feeling like one.

Still of Alessandro Michele, Fashion Neurosis

Employees arrive already holding the sensibility. "I already knew so much about the brand because I loved it." No training needed when selection does the work. It is a model built on genuine cultural alignment rather than manufactured buy-in—and the product reflects it. Reviewers consistently describe the pieces as special and well made. The brand delivers on what it promises.

Kate Moss in Bella Freud

The tension, where it exists, is one of legibility rather than quality. A brand rooted in punk spirit and female authority can be read from the outside as something else—posh, insider, expensive, even kitsch. Celebrity adoption increased visibility while flattening meaning. Yet the world Freud has built rewards closer attention. Fashion Neurosis acts as an open door, revealing the ideas, references, and sensibilities that sit beneath the surface. The substance is there for those willing to look.

Still from Freud’s art film, Submission

Two structures, the same tension. Ralph Lauren resolves coherence through scale and systems. Bella Freud through proximity and selection. Both, in their own way, still doing it—producing worlds that people want to be a part of, making the case that coherence is possible even as culture fragments further.

As brands grow, meaning gets distributed across more people, markets, and touchpoints. What was held closely becomes diffuse. This gets called dilution, but that's not quite right. Meaning doesn't disappear. It becomes unevenly held—some parts of the organisation still carrying it intact, others working from a copy of a copy.

What consumers are actually evaluating—more precisely than most brand strategy assumes—is whether the construction holds together. Whether what a brand shows, makes, and feels like to experience all comes from the same place. Not authenticity in any absolute sense. They know brands are constructed. The question is whether the construction is worth belonging to.

To endure, brands cannot rely on coherence as a fixed state. They must treat it as something continuously produced and recalibrated—not through control, but attention. Recognising where meaning is holding and where it is beginning to shift—not just what the brand intends to be, but how it is actually being lived, interpreted, reshaped in real time. Because the work does not end once the world is constructed. It begins when it is released.

Brands don’t fail when meaning shifts. They drift—and fail when they no longer recognise what they have become.

____________

Definitions:

Cultural Worlds The symbolic environments brands create through products, stories, spaces, rituals, and behaviours. Drawing on Ana Andjelic’s work, cultural worlds allow consumers to participate in a shared system of meaning, offering not just products to purchase but identities, values, and ways of belonging to inhabit.

Brand Coherence The degree to which a brand’s internal culture, external expression, and lived consumer experience remain aligned over time. Rather than consistency alone, coherence refers to the successful translation of organisational intent into signals that are recognisable, believable, and meaningful across touchpoints.

Codes The recurring symbols, aesthetics, behaviours, language, and references through which a brand communicates meaning. Cultural codes act as shorthand, helping audiences quickly recognise and interpret what a brand represents. Examples include Ralph Lauren’s equestrian motifs or Bella Freud’s slogan knitwear.

Cultural Alignment The extent to which an organisation’s internal beliefs, decision-making, and behaviours are reflected in how a brand is experienced externally. It exists when employees, products, environments, and communications reinforce the same underlying values and worldview, strengthening coherence and cultural resonance.